Skip to main content

Dalwood vs Gymea Bay

Property investment comparison - Dalwood, NSW 2335 vs Gymea Bay, NSW 2227

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dalwood wins 1, Gymea Bay wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDalwoodGymea Bay
Median house price$2.2M$2.2M
Median unit price$555K$1.5M
Gross rental yield (houses)1.88%3.08%
Gross rental yield (units)5.70%6.03%
1-year house growth-+5.0%
3-year house growth-+11.6%
Vacancy rate1.5%0.2%
Population1116,983

Dalwood vs Gymea Bay: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.2M in Dalwood and $2.2M in Gymea Bay, so Gymea Bay is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Dalwood sits at a median of $555K against $1.5M in Gymea Bay, which makes Dalwood the more affordable unit market and Gymea Bay the pricier one.

On cash flow, Gymea Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.08%, compared with 1.88% in Dalwood, a gap of 1.20 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Gymea Bay and 1.5% in Dalwood, so landlords in Gymea Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gymea Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,983 against 111, roughly 63 times the size of Dalwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gymea Bay for rental income, Gymea Bay for a lower purchase price, Gymea Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison