Skip to main content

Dalwood vs Wombarra

Property investment comparison - Dalwood, NSW 2335 vs Wombarra, NSW 2515

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dalwood wins 2, Wombarra wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDalwoodWombarra
Median house price$2.2M$2.2M
Median unit price$555K$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)1.88%2.47%
Gross rental yield (units)5.70%4.54%
1-year house growth-+0.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%1.3%
Population111944

Dalwood vs Wombarra: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.2M in Dalwood and $2.2M in Wombarra, so Wombarra is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Dalwood sits at a median of $555K against $1.1M in Wombarra, which makes Dalwood the more affordable unit market and Wombarra the pricier one.

On cash flow, Wombarra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.47%, compared with 1.88% in Dalwood, a gap of 0.59 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Wombarra and 1.5% in Dalwood, so landlords in Wombarra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wombarra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 944 against 111, roughly 9 times the size of Dalwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wombarra for rental income, Wombarra for a lower purchase price, Wombarra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison