Skip to main content

Dalwood vs Gerroa

Property investment comparison - Dalwood, NSW 2477 vs Gerroa, NSW 2534

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dalwood wins 3, Gerroa wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDalwoodGerroa
Median house price$2.1M$2.1M
Median unit price$640K$450K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.18%1.93%
Gross rental yield (units)5.85%6.82%
1-year house growth-+2.1%
3-year house growth--19.8%
Vacancy rate0.3%2.0%
Population218571

Dalwood vs Gerroa: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Dalwood and $2.1M in Gerroa, so Dalwood is the cheaper entry point, with Gerroa houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Dalwood sits at a median of $640K against $450K in Gerroa, which makes Gerroa the more affordable unit market and Dalwood the pricier one.

On cash flow, Dalwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.18%, compared with 1.93% in Gerroa, a gap of 0.25 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Dalwood and 2.0% in Gerroa, so landlords in Dalwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gerroa is the bigger suburb, with a population of 571 against 218, roughly 2.6 times the size of Dalwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Dalwood for rental income, Dalwood for a lower purchase price, Dalwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison