Dalyston vs Linton
Property investment comparison - Dalyston, VIC 3992 vs Linton, VIC 3360
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dalyston wins 1, Linton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dalyston | Linton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $535K | $535K |
| Median unit price | - | $170K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.96% | 3.57% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.42% | 7.37% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +1.4% | +15.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.5% | 2.1% |
| Population | 843 | 635 |
Dalyston vs Linton: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $535K in Dalyston and $535K in Linton.
On cash flow, Dalyston leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.96%, compared with 3.57% in Linton, a gap of 1.39 percentage points.
Looking back three years, Dalyston houses are +1.4% and Linton houses +15.2%, so Linton has compounded faster than Dalyston over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Linton and 2.5% in Dalyston, so landlords in Linton face less competition for tenants.
Dalyston is the bigger suburb, with a population of 843 against 635, larger than Linton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Dalyston for rental income, Linton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison