Dalyston vs Waterford
Property investment comparison - Dalyston, VIC 3992 vs Waterford, VIC 3862
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dalyston wins 1, Waterford wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dalyston | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $535K | $535K |
| Median unit price | - | $360K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.96% | 4.92% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.42% | 4.15% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +1.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.5% | 0.7% |
| Population | 843 | - |
Dalyston vs Waterford: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $535K in Dalyston and $535K in Waterford.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.96% in Dalyston and 4.92% in Waterford, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Waterford and 2.5% in Dalyston, so landlords in Waterford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
In short: Waterford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison