Dampier vs Red Hill
Property investment comparison - Dampier, WA 6713 vs Red Hill, WA 6056
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dampier wins 1, Red Hill wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dampier | Red Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $945K | $935K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 6.84% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 8.84% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +10.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Population | 1,282 | 85 |
Dampier vs Red Hill: what the numbers say
The median house price is $945K in Dampier and $935K in Red Hill, so Red Hill is the cheaper entry point, with Dampier houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.0%.
Dampier is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,282 against 85, roughly 15 times the size of Red Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Red Hill for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison