Skip to main content

Dandenong North vs Whittlesea

Property investment comparison - Dandenong North, VIC 3175 vs Whittlesea, VIC 3757

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dandenong North wins 1, Whittlesea wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDandenong NorthWhittlesea
Median house price$820K$820K
Median unit price$600K$455K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.86%
Gross rental yield (units)4.32%5.10%
1-year house growth+7.9%+5.1%estimate
3-year house growth+12.7%-
Vacancy rate1.5%1.3%
Population22,5506,117

Dandenong North vs Whittlesea: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $820K in Dandenong North and $820K in Whittlesea.

For units, Dandenong North sits at a median of $600K against $455K in Whittlesea, which makes Whittlesea the more affordable unit market and Dandenong North the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Dandenong North and +5.1% in Whittlesea (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Dandenong North, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Whittlesea and 1.5% in Dandenong North, so landlords in Whittlesea face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Dandenong North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 22,550 against 6,117, roughly 3.7 times the size of Whittlesea; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Dandenong North for recent price momentum, Whittlesea for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison