Dandenong vs Hansonville
Property investment comparison - Dandenong, VIC 3175 vs Hansonville, VIC 3675
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dandenong wins 4, Hansonville wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dandenong | Hansonville |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $780K | $785K |
| Median unit price | $465K | $500K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.80% | 3.16% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.45% | 3.60% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.6%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | - |
| Population | 30,127 | 155 |
Dandenong vs Hansonville: what the numbers say
The median house price is $780K in Dandenong and $785K in Hansonville, so Dandenong is the cheaper entry point, with Hansonville houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Dandenong sits at a median of $465K against $500K in Hansonville, which makes Dandenong the more affordable unit market and Hansonville the pricier one.
On cash flow, Dandenong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 3.16% in Hansonville, a gap of 0.64 percentage points.
Dandenong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 30,127 against 155, roughly 194 times the size of Hansonville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Dandenong for rental income, Dandenong for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison