Skip to main content

Darch vs Victoria Park

Property investment comparison - Darch, WA 6065 vs Victoria Park, WA 6100

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Darch wins 4, Victoria Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDarchVictoria Park
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$825K$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.70%
Gross rental yield (units)4.42%-
1-year house growth+19.0%+18.4%
3-year house growth+64.2%+48.9%
Vacancy rate0.4%1.0%
Population7,3479,334

Darch vs Victoria Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Darch and $1.2M in Victoria Park, so Darch is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Darch sits at a median of $825K against $600K in Victoria Park, which makes Victoria Park the more affordable unit market and Darch the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.0% in Darch and +18.4% in Victoria Park, so recent momentum favours Darch, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Darch houses are +64.2% and Victoria Park houses +48.9%, so Darch has compounded faster than Victoria Park over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Darch and 1.0% in Victoria Park, so landlords in Darch face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Victoria Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,334 against 7,347, larger than Darch; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Darch for a lower purchase price, Darch for recent price momentum, Darch for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison