Darley vs Nurrabiel
Property investment comparison - Darley, VIC 3340 vs Nurrabiel, VIC 3401
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Darley wins 1, Nurrabiel wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Darley | Nurrabiel |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $665K | $665K |
| Median unit price | $430K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.91% | 2.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.20% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +2.6% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -5.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | - |
| Population | 9,190 | 43 |
Darley vs Nurrabiel: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $665K in Darley and $665K in Nurrabiel.
On cash flow, Darley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.91%, compared with 2.90% in Nurrabiel, a gap of 1.01 percentage points.
Darley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,190 against 43, roughly 214 times the size of Nurrabiel; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Darley for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison