Skip to main content

Darlington Point vs Gilgandra

Property investment comparison - Darlington Point, NSW 2706 vs Gilgandra, NSW 2827

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Darlington Point wins 2, Gilgandra wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDarlington PointGilgandra
Median house price$355K$345K
Median unit price$405K$500K
Gross rental yield (houses)-5.70%
Gross rental yield (units)4.14%2.49%
1-year house growth+7.1%estimate+10.4%
3-year house growth-+56.0%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.2%
Population1,0302,983

Darlington Point vs Gilgandra: what the numbers say

The median house price is $355K in Darlington Point and $345K in Gilgandra, so Gilgandra is the cheaper entry point, with Darlington Point houses about 3% dearer.

For units, Darlington Point sits at a median of $405K against $500K in Gilgandra, which makes Darlington Point the more affordable unit market and Gilgandra the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.1% in Darlington Point (an estimate) and +10.4% in Gilgandra, so recent momentum favours Gilgandra, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Gilgandra and 0.8% in Darlington Point, so landlords in Gilgandra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gilgandra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,983 against 1,030, roughly 2.9 times the size of Darlington Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gilgandra for a lower purchase price, Gilgandra for recent price momentum, Gilgandra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison