Skip to main content

Darlington Point vs Werris Creek

Property investment comparison - Darlington Point, NSW 2706 vs Werris Creek, NSW 2341

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Darlington Point wins 3, Werris Creek wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDarlington PointWerris Creek
Median house price$355K$370K
Median unit price$405K$520K
Gross rental yield (houses)-5.75%
Gross rental yield (units)4.14%5.95%
1-year house growth+7.1%estimate+12.3%
3-year house growth-+39.9%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.5%
Population1,0301,478

Darlington Point vs Werris Creek: what the numbers say

The median house price is $355K in Darlington Point and $370K in Werris Creek, so Darlington Point is the cheaper entry point, with Werris Creek houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Darlington Point sits at a median of $405K against $520K in Werris Creek, which makes Darlington Point the more affordable unit market and Werris Creek the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.1% in Darlington Point (an estimate) and +12.3% in Werris Creek, so recent momentum favours Werris Creek, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Darlington Point and 1.5% in Werris Creek, so landlords in Darlington Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Werris Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,478 against 1,030, larger than Darlington Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Darlington Point for a lower purchase price, Werris Creek for recent price momentum, Darlington Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison