Skip to main content

Darlington vs Torndirrup

Property investment comparison - Darlington, WA 6070 vs Torndirrup, WA 6330

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Darlington wins 1, Torndirrup wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDarlingtonTorndirrup
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$675K$755K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.40%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.54%3.89%
1-year house growth+13.9%estimate+21.7%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate5.3%2.5%
Population3,725395

Darlington vs Torndirrup: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Darlington and $1.3M in Torndirrup.

For units, Darlington sits at a median of $675K against $755K in Torndirrup, which makes Darlington the more affordable unit market and Torndirrup the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.9% in Darlington (an estimate) and +21.7% in Torndirrup, so recent momentum favours Torndirrup, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.5% in Torndirrup and 5.3% in Darlington, so landlords in Torndirrup face less competition for tenants.

Darlington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,725 against 395, roughly 9 times the size of Torndirrup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Torndirrup for recent price momentum, Torndirrup for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison