Skip to main content

Darlington vs Wellesley

Property investment comparison - Darlington, WA 6070 vs Wellesley, WA 6233

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Darlington wins 2, Wellesley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDarlingtonWellesley
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$675K$85K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.40%3.11%
Gross rental yield (units)2.54%-
1-year house growth+13.9%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate5.3%1.4%
Population3,72535

Darlington vs Wellesley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Darlington and $1.3M in Wellesley, so Darlington is the cheaper entry point, with Wellesley houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Darlington sits at a median of $675K against $85K in Wellesley, which makes Wellesley the more affordable unit market and Darlington the pricier one.

On cash flow, Darlington leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.40%, compared with 3.11% in Wellesley, a gap of 0.29 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Wellesley and 5.3% in Darlington, so landlords in Wellesley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Darlington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,725 against 35, roughly 106 times the size of Wellesley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Darlington for rental income, Darlington for a lower purchase price, Wellesley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison