Daruka vs Wondabyne
Property investment comparison - Daruka, NSW 2340 vs Wondabyne, NSW 2256
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Daruka wins 2, Wondabyne wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Daruka | Wondabyne |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Median unit price | $360K | $695K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.00% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.66% | 5.03% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +26.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 8.2% | 1.4% |
| Population | 770 | 3 |
Daruka vs Wondabyne: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Daruka and $1.0M in Wondabyne.
For units, Daruka sits at a median of $360K against $695K in Wondabyne, which makes Daruka the more affordable unit market and Wondabyne the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Wondabyne and 8.2% in Daruka, so landlords in Wondabyne face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Daruka is the bigger suburb, with a population of 770 against 3, roughly 257 times the size of Wondabyne; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wondabyne for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison