Skip to main content

Davidson vs Denistone

Property investment comparison - Davidson, NSW 2085 vs Denistone, NSW 2114

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Davidson wins 2, Denistone wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDavidsonDenistone
Median house price$2.4M$2.4M
Median unit price$630K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.50%2.60%
Gross rental yield (units)6.60%-
1-year house growth+2.4%-5.0%estimate
3-year house growth+4.3%-
Vacancy rate3.9%1.3%
Population2,7253,726

Davidson vs Denistone: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.4M in Davidson and $2.4M in Denistone, so Denistone is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Davidson leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.50%, compared with 2.60% in Denistone, a gap of 0.90 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.4% in Davidson and -5.0% in Denistone (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Davidson, while Denistone went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Denistone and 3.9% in Davidson, so landlords in Denistone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Denistone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,726 against 2,725, larger than Davidson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Davidson for rental income, Denistone for a lower purchase price, Davidson for recent price momentum, Denistone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison