Dawesville vs Gap Ridge
Property investment comparison - Dawesville, WA 6211 vs Gap Ridge, WA 6714
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dawesville wins 1, Gap Ridge wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dawesville | Gap Ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $880K | $875K |
| Median unit price | - | $2.1M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.75% | 8.60% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.07% | 2.40% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +58.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 6.1% | 0.5% |
| Population | 7,143 | 175 |
Dawesville vs Gap Ridge: what the numbers say
The median house price is $880K in Dawesville and $875K in Gap Ridge, so Gap Ridge is the cheaper entry point, with Dawesville houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Gap Ridge leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 8.60%, compared with 3.75% in Dawesville, a gap of 4.85 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Gap Ridge and 6.1% in Dawesville, so landlords in Gap Ridge face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Dawesville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,143 against 175, roughly 41 times the size of Gap Ridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Gap Ridge for rental income, Gap Ridge for a lower purchase price, Gap Ridge for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison