Skip to main content

Dawesville vs Milpara

Property investment comparison - Dawesville, WA 6211 vs Milpara, WA 6330

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dawesville wins 0, Milpara wins 6. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDawesvilleMilpara
Median house price$880K$875K
Median unit price-$475K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.75%4.56%
Gross rental yield (units)4.07%6.57%
1-year house growth+14.9%+20.2%
3-year house growth+58.9%+75.5%
Vacancy rate6.1%2.2%
Population7,143953

Dawesville vs Milpara: what the numbers say

The median house price is $880K in Dawesville and $875K in Milpara, so Milpara is the cheaper entry point, with Dawesville houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Milpara leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.56%, compared with 3.75% in Dawesville, a gap of 0.81 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Dawesville and +20.2% in Milpara, so recent momentum favours Milpara, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Dawesville houses are +58.9% and Milpara houses +75.5%, so Milpara has compounded faster than Dawesville over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Milpara and 6.1% in Dawesville, so landlords in Milpara face less competition for tenants.

Dawesville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,143 against 953, roughly 7 times the size of Milpara; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Milpara for rental income, Milpara for a lower purchase price, Milpara for recent price momentum, Milpara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison