Skip to main content

Dawesville vs Mount Richon

Property investment comparison - Dawesville, WA 6211 vs Mount Richon, WA 6112

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dawesville wins 1, Mount Richon wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDawesvilleMount Richon
Median house price$880K$890K
Median unit price-$595K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.75%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.07%5.40%
1-year house growth+14.9%+19.1%
3-year house growth+58.9%+75.8%
Vacancy rate6.1%1.9%
Population7,1432,067

Dawesville vs Mount Richon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $880K in Dawesville and $890K in Mount Richon, so Dawesville is the cheaper entry point, with Mount Richon houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Dawesville and +19.1% in Mount Richon, so recent momentum favours Mount Richon, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Dawesville houses are +58.9% and Mount Richon houses +75.8%, so Mount Richon has compounded faster than Dawesville over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Mount Richon and 6.1% in Dawesville, so landlords in Mount Richon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Dawesville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,143 against 2,067, roughly 3.5 times the size of Mount Richon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Dawesville for a lower purchase price, Mount Richon for recent price momentum, Mount Richon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Dawesville vs Mount Richon: Suburb Comparison 2026