Skip to main content

Deagon vs Eudlo

Property investment comparison - Deagon, QLD 4017 vs Eudlo, QLD 4554

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Deagon wins 5, Eudlo wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDeagonEudlo
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$340K$665K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.24%3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)6.04%1.53%
1-year house growth-+10.4%
3-year house growth+45.7%+32.7%
Vacancy rate0.8%3.1%
Population3,7731,192

Deagon vs Eudlo: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Deagon and $1.1M in Eudlo.

For units, Deagon sits at a median of $340K against $665K in Eudlo, which makes Deagon the more affordable unit market and Eudlo the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.24% in Deagon and 3.20% in Eudlo, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Looking back three years, Deagon houses are +45.7% and Eudlo houses +32.7%, so Deagon has compounded faster than Eudlo over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Deagon and 3.1% in Eudlo, so landlords in Deagon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Deagon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,773 against 1,192, roughly 3.2 times the size of Eudlo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Deagon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison