Skip to main content

Deagon vs Taigum

Property investment comparison - Deagon, QLD 4017 vs Taigum, QLD 4018

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Deagon wins 2, Taigum wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDeagonTaigum
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$340K$795K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.24%3.64%
Gross rental yield (units)6.04%-
1-year house growth-+19.5%estimate
3-year house growth+45.7%-
Vacancy rate0.8%0.5%
Population3,7737,801

Deagon vs Taigum: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Deagon and $1.1M in Taigum, so Deagon is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Deagon sits at a median of $340K against $795K in Taigum, which makes Deagon the more affordable unit market and Taigum the pricier one.

On cash flow, Taigum leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.64%, compared with 3.24% in Deagon, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Taigum and 0.8% in Deagon, so landlords in Taigum face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Taigum is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,801 against 3,773, roughly 2.1 times the size of Deagon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Taigum for rental income, Deagon for a lower purchase price, Taigum for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison