Dean vs Seddon
Property investment comparison - Dean, VIC 3352 vs Seddon, VIC 3011
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dean wins 1, Seddon wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dean | Seddon |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $70K | $715K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.36% | 3.45% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | -1.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Population | 132 | 5,143 |
Dean vs Seddon: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Dean and $1.1M in Seddon.
For units, Dean sits at a median of $70K against $715K in Seddon, which makes Dean the more affordable unit market and Seddon the pricier one.
On cash flow, Seddon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.45%, compared with 2.36% in Dean, a gap of 1.09 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Seddon and 1.7% in Dean, so landlords in Seddon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Seddon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,143 against 132, roughly 39 times the size of Dean; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Seddon for rental income, Seddon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison