Skip to main content

Deanside vs Kialla

Property investment comparison - Deanside, VIC 3336 vs Kialla, VIC 3631

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Deanside wins 1, Kialla wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDeansideKialla
Median house price$705K$705K
Median unit price$535K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.39%
Gross rental yield (units)4.34%5.36%
1-year house growth+0.4%+4.2%
3-year house growth+7.8%+4.2%
Vacancy rate14.3%1.6%
Population6548,667

Deanside vs Kialla: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $705K in Deanside and $705K in Kialla.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.4% in Deanside and +4.2% in Kialla, so recent momentum favours Kialla, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Deanside houses are +7.8% and Kialla houses +4.2%, so Deanside has compounded faster than Kialla over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Kialla and 14.3% in Deanside, so landlords in Kialla face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kialla is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,667 against 654, roughly 13 times the size of Deanside; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kialla for recent price momentum, Kialla for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison