Skip to main content

Deep Bay vs Latrobe

Property investment comparison - Deep Bay, TAS 7112 vs Latrobe, TAS 7307

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Deep Bay wins 3, Latrobe wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDeep BayLatrobe
Median house price$670K$675K
Median unit price$315K$485K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.55%
Gross rental yield (units)8.28%4.98%
1-year house growth+9.1%+12.2%
3-year house growth-+25.6%
Vacancy rate5.9%1.1%
Population2675,030

Deep Bay vs Latrobe: what the numbers say

The median house price is $670K in Deep Bay and $675K in Latrobe, so Deep Bay is the cheaper entry point, with Latrobe houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Deep Bay sits at a median of $315K against $485K in Latrobe, which makes Deep Bay the more affordable unit market and Latrobe the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.1% in Deep Bay and +12.2% in Latrobe, so recent momentum favours Latrobe, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Latrobe and 5.9% in Deep Bay, so landlords in Latrobe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Latrobe is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,030 against 267, roughly 19 times the size of Deep Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Deep Bay for a lower purchase price, Latrobe for recent price momentum, Latrobe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison