Skip to main content

Delahey vs Shelford

Property investment comparison - Delahey, VIC 3037 vs Shelford, VIC 3329

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Delahey wins 2, Shelford wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDelaheyShelford
Median house price$745K$745K
Median unit price$610K$570K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.51%2.23%
Gross rental yield (units)3.97%-
1-year house growth+12.6%-
3-year house growth+15.8%-
Vacancy rate1.5%5.5%
Population8,077263

Delahey vs Shelford: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $745K in Delahey and $745K in Shelford.

For units, Delahey sits at a median of $610K against $570K in Shelford, which makes Shelford the more affordable unit market and Delahey the pricier one.

On cash flow, Delahey leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.51%, compared with 2.23% in Shelford, a gap of 1.28 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Delahey and 5.5% in Shelford, so landlords in Delahey face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Delahey is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,077 against 263, roughly 31 times the size of Shelford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Delahey for rental income, Delahey for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison