Skip to main content

Denman vs Stony Chute

Property investment comparison - Denman, NSW 2328 vs Stony Chute, NSW 2480

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Denman wins 1, Stony Chute wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDenmanStony Chute
Median house price$595K$600K
Median unit price$585K$455K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.00%6.07%
Gross rental yield (units)3.92%4.75%
1-year house growth+11.2%-
3-year house growth+36.1%-
Vacancy rate3.6%0.3%
Population1,821156

Denman vs Stony Chute: what the numbers say

The median house price is $595K in Denman and $600K in Stony Chute, so Denman is the cheaper entry point, with Stony Chute houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Denman sits at a median of $585K against $455K in Stony Chute, which makes Stony Chute the more affordable unit market and Denman the pricier one.

On cash flow, Stony Chute leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.07%, compared with 5.00% in Denman, a gap of 1.07 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Stony Chute and 3.6% in Denman, so landlords in Stony Chute face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Denman is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,821 against 156, roughly 12 times the size of Stony Chute; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Stony Chute for rental income, Denman for a lower purchase price, Stony Chute for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison