Skip to main content

Denman vs Wattle

Property investment comparison - Denman, NSW 2328 vs Wattle, NSW 2795

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Denman wins 2, Wattle wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDenmanWattle
Median house price$595K$600K
Median unit price$585K$450K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.00%4.43%
Gross rental yield (units)3.92%5.34%
1-year house growth+11.2%-
3-year house growth+36.1%-
Vacancy rate3.6%0.8%
Population1,82112,169

Denman vs Wattle: what the numbers say

The median house price is $595K in Denman and $600K in Wattle, so Denman is the cheaper entry point, with Wattle houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Denman sits at a median of $585K against $450K in Wattle, which makes Wattle the more affordable unit market and Denman the pricier one.

On cash flow, Denman leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.00%, compared with 4.43% in Wattle, a gap of 0.57 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Wattle and 3.6% in Denman, so landlords in Wattle face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wattle is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,169 against 1,821, roughly 7 times the size of Denman; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Denman for rental income, Denman for a lower purchase price, Wattle for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison