Skip to main content

Denmark vs Nollamara

Property investment comparison - Denmark, WA 6333 vs Nollamara, WA 6061

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Denmark wins 2, Nollamara wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDenmarkNollamara
Median house price$840K$840K
Median unit price$295K$755K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%4.62%
Gross rental yield (units)5.54%-
1-year house growth+19.3%estimate+23.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.3%0.5%
Population2,69112,779

Denmark vs Nollamara: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in Denmark and $840K in Nollamara.

For units, Denmark sits at a median of $295K against $755K in Nollamara, which makes Denmark the more affordable unit market and Nollamara the pricier one.

On cash flow, Nollamara leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.62%, compared with 4.00% in Denmark, a gap of 0.62 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.3% in Denmark (an estimate) and +23.5% in Nollamara (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Nollamara, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Denmark and 0.5% in Nollamara, so landlords in Denmark face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Nollamara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,779 against 2,691, roughly 4.7 times the size of Denmark; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Nollamara for rental income, Nollamara for recent price momentum, Denmark for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison