Skip to main content

Depot Hill vs Mount St John

Property investment comparison - Depot Hill, QLD 4700 vs Mount St John, QLD 4818

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Depot Hill wins 1, Mount St John wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDepot HillMount St John
Median house price$395K$395K
Median unit price$520K$410K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.21%8.43%
Gross rental yield (units)4.86%6.55%
1-year house growth+21.7%-
3-year house growth+88.1%-
Vacancy rate0.9%1.4%
Population995103

Depot Hill vs Mount St John: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $395K in Depot Hill and $395K in Mount St John.

For units, Depot Hill sits at a median of $520K against $410K in Mount St John, which makes Mount St John the more affordable unit market and Depot Hill the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mount St John leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 8.43%, compared with 5.21% in Depot Hill, a gap of 3.22 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Depot Hill and 1.4% in Mount St John, so landlords in Depot Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Depot Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 995 against 103, roughly 10 times the size of Mount St John; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount St John for rental income, Depot Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison