Derrimut vs Lardner
Property investment comparison - Derrimut, VIC 3026 vs Lardner, VIC 3821
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Derrimut wins 2, Lardner wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Derrimut | Lardner |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $840K | $840K |
| Median unit price | $830K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.73% | 2.93% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.42% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +10.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +13.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 12.4% |
| Population | 8,651 | 110 |
Derrimut vs Lardner: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in Derrimut and $840K in Lardner.
On cash flow, Derrimut leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.73%, compared with 2.93% in Lardner, a gap of 0.80 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Derrimut and 12.4% in Lardner, so landlords in Derrimut face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Derrimut is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,651 against 110, roughly 79 times the size of Lardner; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Derrimut for rental income, Derrimut for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison