Skip to main content

Derrimut vs Point Cook

Property investment comparison - Derrimut, VIC 3026 vs Point Cook, VIC 3030

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Derrimut wins 3, Point Cook wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDerrimutPoint Cook
Median house price$840K$845K
Median unit price$830K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.73%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.42%4.48%
1-year house growth+10.2%+6.4%estimate
3-year house growth+13.2%-
Vacancy rate0.8%2.1%
Population8,65166,781

Derrimut vs Point Cook: what the numbers say

The median house price is $840K in Derrimut and $845K in Point Cook, so Derrimut is the cheaper entry point, with Point Cook houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Derrimut sits at a median of $830K against $580K in Point Cook, which makes Point Cook the more affordable unit market and Derrimut the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.2% in Derrimut and +6.4% in Point Cook (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Derrimut, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Derrimut and 2.1% in Point Cook, so landlords in Derrimut face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Point Cook is the bigger suburb, with a population of 66,781 against 8,651, roughly 8 times the size of Derrimut; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Derrimut for a lower purchase price, Derrimut for recent price momentum, Derrimut for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison