Derrimut vs Tarcombe
Property investment comparison - Derrimut, VIC 3026 vs Tarcombe, VIC 3666
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Derrimut wins 2, Tarcombe wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Derrimut | Tarcombe |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $840K | $845K |
| Median unit price | $830K | $365K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.73% | 3.08% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.42% | 4.78% |
| 1-year house growth | +10.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +13.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Population | 8,651 | 32 |
Derrimut vs Tarcombe: what the numbers say
The median house price is $840K in Derrimut and $845K in Tarcombe, so Derrimut is the cheaper entry point, with Tarcombe houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Derrimut sits at a median of $830K against $365K in Tarcombe, which makes Tarcombe the more affordable unit market and Derrimut the pricier one.
On cash flow, Derrimut leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.73%, compared with 3.08% in Tarcombe, a gap of 0.65 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.8%.
Derrimut is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,651 against 32, roughly 270 times the size of Tarcombe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Derrimut for rental income, Derrimut for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison