Skip to main content

Devon Hills vs Tranmere

Property investment comparison - Devon Hills, TAS 7300 vs Tranmere, TAS 7018

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Devon Hills wins 3, Tranmere wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDevon HillsTranmere
Median house price$1.5M$1.2M
Median unit price$380K$890K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.15%
Gross rental yield (units)7.12%-
1-year house growth+12.0%+5.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.4%1.6%
Population4342,218

Devon Hills vs Tranmere: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Devon Hills and $1.2M in Tranmere, so Tranmere is the cheaper entry point, with Devon Hills houses about 23% dearer.

For units, Devon Hills sits at a median of $380K against $890K in Tranmere, which makes Devon Hills the more affordable unit market and Tranmere the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Devon Hills and +5.8% in Tranmere (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Devon Hills, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Devon Hills and 1.6% in Tranmere, so landlords in Devon Hills face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tranmere is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,218 against 434, roughly 5 times the size of Devon Hills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tranmere for a lower purchase price, Devon Hills for recent price momentum, Devon Hills for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison