Digby vs Edenhope
Property investment comparison - Digby, VIC 3309 vs Edenhope, VIC 3318
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Digby wins 3, Edenhope wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Digby | Edenhope |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $275K | $320K |
| Median unit price | $445K | $340K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 6.50% | 6.30% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.38% | 3.57% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 0.8% |
| Population | 122 | 937 |
Digby vs Edenhope: what the numbers say
The median house price is $275K in Digby and $320K in Edenhope, so Digby is the cheaper entry point, with Edenhope houses about 16% dearer.
For units, Digby sits at a median of $445K against $340K in Edenhope, which makes Edenhope the more affordable unit market and Digby the pricier one.
On cash flow, Digby leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.50%, compared with 6.30% in Edenhope, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.
Edenhope is the bigger suburb, with a population of 937 against 122, roughly 8 times the size of Digby; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Digby for rental income, Digby for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison