Diglum vs Tully
Property investment comparison - Diglum, QLD 4680 vs Tully, QLD 4854
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Diglum wins 2, Tully wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Diglum | Tully |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $370K | $385K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 7.85% | 5.13% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.65% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +16.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.3% | 0.0% |
| Population | 56 | 2,368 |
Diglum vs Tully: what the numbers say
The median house price is $370K in Diglum and $385K in Tully, so Diglum is the cheaper entry point, with Tully houses about 4% dearer.
On cash flow, Diglum leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.85%, compared with 5.13% in Tully, a gap of 2.72 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.0% in Tully and 2.3% in Diglum, so landlords in Tully face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Tully is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,368 against 56, roughly 42 times the size of Diglum; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Diglum for rental income, Diglum for a lower purchase price, Tully for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison