Dimboola vs Douglas
Property investment comparison - Dimboola, VIC 3414 vs Douglas, VIC 3401
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dimboola wins 2, Douglas wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dimboola | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $320K | $315K |
| Median unit price | $350K | $455K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.91% | 6.09% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.41% | 1.50% |
| 1-year house growth | - | - |
| 3-year house growth | +12.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.4% | - |
| Population | 1,635 | 74 |
Dimboola vs Douglas: what the numbers say
The median house price is $320K in Dimboola and $315K in Douglas, so Douglas is the cheaper entry point, with Dimboola houses about 2% dearer.
For units, Dimboola sits at a median of $350K against $455K in Douglas, which makes Dimboola the more affordable unit market and Douglas the pricier one.
On cash flow, Douglas leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.09%, compared with 5.91% in Dimboola, a gap of 0.18 percentage points.
Dimboola is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,635 against 74, roughly 22 times the size of Douglas; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Douglas for rental income, Douglas for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison