Skip to main content

Djugun vs Greenmount

Property investment comparison - Djugun, WA 6725 vs Greenmount, WA 6056

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Djugun wins 3, Greenmount wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDjugunGreenmount
Median house price$880K$880K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)7.50%4.13%
Gross rental yield (units)8.76%4.95%
1-year house growth+9.6%+15.7%estimate
3-year house growth+29.3%-
Vacancy rate0.7%2.4%
Population3,2912,666

Djugun vs Greenmount: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $880K in Djugun and $880K in Greenmount.

On cash flow, Djugun leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.50%, compared with 4.13% in Greenmount, a gap of 3.37 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.6% in Djugun and +15.7% in Greenmount (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Greenmount, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Djugun and 2.4% in Greenmount, so landlords in Djugun face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Djugun is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,291 against 2,666, larger than Greenmount; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Djugun for rental income, Greenmount for recent price momentum, Djugun for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison