Skip to main content

Djugun vs High Wycombe

Property investment comparison - Djugun, WA 6725 vs High Wycombe, WA 6057

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Djugun wins 3, High Wycombe wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDjugunHigh Wycombe
Median house price$880K$880K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)7.50%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)8.76%4.54%
1-year house growth+9.6%+19.3%
3-year house growth+29.3%+63.8%
Vacancy rate0.7%0.8%
Population3,29112,198

Djugun vs High Wycombe: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $880K in Djugun and $880K in High Wycombe.

On cash flow, Djugun leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.50%, compared with 4.40% in High Wycombe, a gap of 3.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.6% in Djugun and +19.3% in High Wycombe, so recent momentum favours High Wycombe, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Djugun houses are +29.3% and High Wycombe houses +63.8%, so High Wycombe has compounded faster than Djugun over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Djugun and 0.8% in High Wycombe, so landlords in Djugun face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

High Wycombe is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,198 against 3,291, roughly 3.7 times the size of Djugun; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Djugun for rental income, High Wycombe for recent price momentum, Djugun for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison