Djugun vs Martin
Property investment comparison - Djugun, WA 6725 vs Martin, WA 6110
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Djugun wins 2, Martin wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Djugun | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $880K | $880K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 7.50% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 8.76% | 3.56% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.6% | +15.0%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +29.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 1.3% |
| Population | 3,291 | 1,854 |
Djugun vs Martin: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $880K in Djugun and $880K in Martin.
Over the past year house prices moved +9.6% in Djugun and +15.0% in Martin (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Martin, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Djugun and 1.3% in Martin, so landlords in Djugun face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Djugun is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,291 against 1,854, larger than Martin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Martin for recent price momentum, Djugun for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison