Skip to main content

Djugun vs Mount Richon

Property investment comparison - Djugun, WA 6725 vs Mount Richon, WA 6112

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Djugun wins 3, Mount Richon wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDjugunMount Richon
Median house price$880K$890K
Median unit price-$595K
Gross rental yield (houses)7.50%-
Gross rental yield (units)8.76%5.40%
1-year house growth+9.6%+19.1%
3-year house growth+29.3%+75.8%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.9%
Population3,2912,067

Djugun vs Mount Richon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $880K in Djugun and $890K in Mount Richon, so Djugun is the cheaper entry point, with Mount Richon houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.6% in Djugun and +19.1% in Mount Richon, so recent momentum favours Mount Richon, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Djugun houses are +29.3% and Mount Richon houses +75.8%, so Mount Richon has compounded faster than Djugun over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Djugun and 1.9% in Mount Richon, so landlords in Djugun face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Djugun is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,291 against 2,067, larger than Mount Richon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Djugun for a lower purchase price, Mount Richon for recent price momentum, Djugun for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison