Docker vs Montrose
Property investment comparison - Docker, VIC 3678 vs Montrose, VIC 3765
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Docker wins 2, Montrose wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Docker | Montrose |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $975K | $980K |
| Median unit price | $445K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.93% | 3.63% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.41% | 3.52% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +2.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +15.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 0.3% |
| Population | 106 | 6,900 |
Docker vs Montrose: what the numbers say
The median house price is $975K in Docker and $980K in Montrose, so Docker is the cheaper entry point, with Montrose houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Docker leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.93%, compared with 3.63% in Montrose, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Montrose and 2.0% in Docker, so landlords in Montrose face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Montrose is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,900 against 106, roughly 65 times the size of Docker; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Docker for rental income, Docker for a lower purchase price, Montrose for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison