Skip to main content

Doncaster vs Fitzroy

Property investment comparison - Doncaster, VIC 3108 vs Fitzroy, VIC 3065

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Doncaster wins 3, Fitzroy wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDoncasterFitzroy
Median house price$1.5M$1.6M
Median unit price$650K$810K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.70%3.60%
Gross rental yield (units)5.15%-
1-year house growth+1.6%-10.2%estimate
3-year house growth-1.1%-
Vacancy rate1.9%0.8%
Population25,02010,431

Doncaster vs Fitzroy: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Doncaster and $1.6M in Fitzroy, so Doncaster is the cheaper entry point, with Fitzroy houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Doncaster sits at a median of $650K against $810K in Fitzroy, which makes Doncaster the more affordable unit market and Fitzroy the pricier one.

On cash flow, Fitzroy leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 2.70% in Doncaster, a gap of 0.90 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.6% in Doncaster and -10.2% in Fitzroy (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Doncaster, while Fitzroy went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Fitzroy and 1.9% in Doncaster, so landlords in Fitzroy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Doncaster is the bigger suburb, with a population of 25,020 against 10,431, roughly 2.4 times the size of Fitzroy; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fitzroy for rental income, Doncaster for a lower purchase price, Doncaster for recent price momentum, Fitzroy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison