Skip to main content

Doncaster vs Strathmore

Property investment comparison - Doncaster, VIC 3108 vs Strathmore, VIC 3041

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Doncaster wins 3, Strathmore wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDoncasterStrathmore
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$650K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.70%2.73%
Gross rental yield (units)5.15%4.40%
1-year house growth+1.6%-5.5%estimate
3-year house growth-1.1%-
Vacancy rate1.9%2.8%
Population25,0208,980

Doncaster vs Strathmore: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Doncaster and $1.5M in Strathmore, so Strathmore is the cheaper entry point.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.70% in Doncaster and 2.73% in Strathmore, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.6% in Doncaster and -5.5% in Strathmore (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Doncaster, while Strathmore went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Doncaster and 2.8% in Strathmore, so landlords in Doncaster face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Doncaster is the bigger suburb, with a population of 25,020 against 8,980, roughly 2.8 times the size of Strathmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Strathmore for a lower purchase price, Doncaster for recent price momentum, Doncaster for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison