Douglas vs Kerang
Property investment comparison - Douglas, VIC 3401 vs Kerang, VIC 3579
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Douglas wins 2, Kerang wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Douglas | Kerang |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $315K | $330K |
| Median unit price | $455K | $220K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 6.09% | 5.84% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 1.50% | 5.20% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 0.7% |
| Population | 74 | 3,960 |
Douglas vs Kerang: what the numbers say
The median house price is $315K in Douglas and $330K in Kerang, so Douglas is the cheaper entry point, with Kerang houses about 5% dearer.
For units, Douglas sits at a median of $455K against $220K in Kerang, which makes Kerang the more affordable unit market and Douglas the pricier one.
On cash flow, Douglas leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.09%, compared with 5.84% in Kerang, a gap of 0.25 percentage points.
Kerang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,960 against 74, roughly 54 times the size of Douglas; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Douglas for rental income, Douglas for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison