Skip to main content

Drayton vs Sharon

Property investment comparison - Drayton, QLD 4350 vs Sharon, QLD 4670

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Drayton wins 2, Sharon wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDraytonSharon
Median house price$830K$825K
Median unit price$610K$445K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%4.70%
Gross rental yield (units)3.83%6.13%
1-year house growth+23.6%estimate+14.8%
3-year house growth-+41.4%
Vacancy rate0.4%1.2%
Population1,8131,209

Drayton vs Sharon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $830K in Drayton and $825K in Sharon, so Sharon is the cheaper entry point, with Drayton houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Drayton sits at a median of $610K against $445K in Sharon, which makes Sharon the more affordable unit market and Drayton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Sharon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.70%, compared with 3.60% in Drayton, a gap of 1.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +23.6% in Drayton (an estimate) and +14.8% in Sharon, so recent momentum favours Drayton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Drayton and 1.2% in Sharon, so landlords in Drayton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Drayton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,813 against 1,209, larger than Sharon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sharon for rental income, Sharon for a lower purchase price, Drayton for recent price momentum, Drayton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison