Skip to main content

Drewvale vs Flaxton

Property investment comparison - Drewvale, QLD 4116 vs Flaxton, QLD 4560

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Drewvale wins 4, Flaxton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDrewvaleFlaxton
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$760K$915K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.92%3.66%
1-year house growth+11.1%+13.0%
3-year house growth+37.5%+8.3%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.6%
Population4,779992

Drewvale vs Flaxton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Drewvale and $1.2M in Flaxton.

For units, Drewvale sits at a median of $760K against $915K in Flaxton, which makes Drewvale the more affordable unit market and Flaxton the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.1% in Drewvale and +13.0% in Flaxton, so recent momentum favours Flaxton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Drewvale houses are +37.5% and Flaxton houses +8.3%, so Drewvale has compounded faster than Flaxton over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Drewvale and 1.6% in Flaxton, so landlords in Drewvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Drewvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,779 against 992, roughly 4.8 times the size of Flaxton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Flaxton for recent price momentum, Drewvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison