Skip to main content

Drewvale vs Keperra

Property investment comparison - Drewvale, QLD 4116 vs Keperra, QLD 4054

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Drewvale wins 2, Keperra wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDrewvaleKeperra
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$760K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%3.06%
Gross rental yield (units)4.92%-
1-year house growth+11.1%+15.0%
3-year house growth+37.5%+50.8%
Vacancy rate1.4%0.8%
Population4,7797,014

Drewvale vs Keperra: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Drewvale and $1.2M in Keperra, so Drewvale is the cheaper entry point, with Keperra houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Drewvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 3.06% in Keperra, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.1% in Drewvale and +15.0% in Keperra, so recent momentum favours Keperra, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Drewvale houses are +37.5% and Keperra houses +50.8%, so Keperra has compounded faster than Drewvale over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Keperra and 1.4% in Drewvale, so landlords in Keperra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Keperra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,014 against 4,779, larger than Drewvale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Drewvale for rental income, Drewvale for a lower purchase price, Keperra for recent price momentum, Keperra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison