Skip to main content

Drouin vs Mudgegonga

Property investment comparison - Drouin, VIC 3818 vs Mudgegonga, VIC 3737

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Drouin wins 4, Mudgegonga wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDrouinMudgegonga
Median house price$665K$670K
Median unit price$470K$660K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.50%4.68%
Gross rental yield (units)4.98%2.81%
1-year house growth+4.7%-
3-year house growth+4.6%-
Vacancy rate1.5%1.7%
Population15,287184

Drouin vs Mudgegonga: what the numbers say

The median house price is $665K in Drouin and $670K in Mudgegonga, so Drouin is the cheaper entry point, with Mudgegonga houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Drouin sits at a median of $470K against $660K in Mudgegonga, which makes Drouin the more affordable unit market and Mudgegonga the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mudgegonga leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.68%, compared with 4.50% in Drouin, a gap of 0.18 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Drouin and 1.7% in Mudgegonga, so landlords in Drouin face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Drouin is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,287 against 184, roughly 83 times the size of Mudgegonga; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mudgegonga for rental income, Drouin for a lower purchase price, Drouin for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison