Drummartin vs Wedderburn
Property investment comparison - Drummartin, VIC 3570 vs Wedderburn, VIC 3518
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Drummartin wins 2, Wedderburn wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Drummartin | Wedderburn |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $360K | $350K |
| Median unit price | - | $395K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 7.75% | 4.98% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.25% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +23.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +16.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 3.3% |
| Population | 42 | 951 |
Drummartin vs Wedderburn: what the numbers say
The median house price is $360K in Drummartin and $350K in Wedderburn, so Wedderburn is the cheaper entry point, with Drummartin houses about 3% dearer.
On cash flow, Drummartin leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.75%, compared with 4.98% in Wedderburn, a gap of 2.77 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Drummartin and 3.3% in Wedderburn, so landlords in Drummartin face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Wedderburn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 951 against 42, roughly 23 times the size of Drummartin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Drummartin for rental income, Wedderburn for a lower purchase price, Drummartin for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison