Skip to main content

Dudley vs Loftus

Property investment comparison - Dudley, NSW 2290 vs Loftus, NSW 2232

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dudley wins 5, Loftus wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDudleyLoftus
Median house price$1.7M$1.7M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)2.51%3.04%
Gross rental yield (units)4.27%3.13%
1-year house growth+10.4%+5.1%
3-year house growth+31.8%+10.9%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.7%
Population2,5054,190

Dudley vs Loftus: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.7M in Dudley and $1.7M in Loftus, so Dudley is the cheaper entry point, with Loftus houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Loftus leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.04%, compared with 2.51% in Dudley, a gap of 0.53 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.4% in Dudley and +5.1% in Loftus, so recent momentum favours Dudley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Dudley houses are +31.8% and Loftus houses +10.9%, so Dudley has compounded faster than Loftus over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Dudley and 1.7% in Loftus, so landlords in Dudley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Loftus is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,190 against 2,505, larger than Dudley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Loftus for rental income, Dudley for a lower purchase price, Dudley for recent price momentum, Dudley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison